Celebrating 22 Years on the Web
TODAY IN SCIENCE HISTORY ®
Find science on or your birthday

107

Stories About Chemistry

INDEX

90. Is There a Limit?

Everything in the world has an end, except the universe, which had no beginning and will have no end. Therefore, generally speaking, there is a limit to analysis, and there is no doubt about that. If we learn to determine the chemical nature of separate atoms of elements or molecules of a chemical substance, we may consider that the limit has been reached.

But that is not what we wanted to point out. As late as the forties of our century, some twenty-five years ago, chemists could analyse most impurities if their content in the principal substance was of the order of 0.01-0.001 per cent, and this suited almost everyone. But nowadays science and technology progress at such a terrific rate that by the early sixties it was already necessary to determine about one thousand billionth (10–12) of a per cent of an impurity. But at that time we were only approaching such sensitivities in determining individual elements. At present there are already several elements and their compounds which we can determine in such quantities, thanks, primarily, to the methods of activation analysis, gas chromatography and mass-spectrometry, which enable scientists to determine such “trifles.”

The requirements imposed on impurity analysis will continue to mount steadily. Academician I. Alimarin, a renowned Soviet scientist, believes that the requirements for materials with respect to purity tend to such a limit where it will be necessary to determine single atoms of the impurity, i.e, amounts of substance of the order of 10–23 gram. This difficult task will have to be coped with by physicists and chemists jointly. It has been solved so far for radioactive atoms. We can already determine the radioactive atoms of some chemical elements singly. However, the sensitivity of determination of the stable atoms and their compounds is still far from the limit. And here methods of analysis still await those who will succeed in “filling in” this “blank.”


< back     next >

- 100 -
Sophie Germain
Gertrude Elion
Ernest Rutherford
James Chadwick
Marcel Proust
William Harvey
Johann Goethe
John Keynes
Carl Gauss
Paul Feyerabend
- 90 -
Antoine Lavoisier
Lise Meitner
Charles Babbage
Ibn Khaldun
Euclid
Ralph Emerson
Robert Bunsen
Frederick Banting
Andre Ampere
Winston Churchill
- 80 -
John Locke
Bronislaw Malinowski
Bible
Thomas Huxley
Alessandro Volta
Erwin Schrodinger
Wilhelm Roentgen
Louis Pasteur
Bertrand Russell
Jean Lamarck
- 70 -
Samuel Morse
John Wheeler
Nicolaus Copernicus
Robert Fulton
Pierre Laplace
Humphry Davy
Thomas Edison
Lord Kelvin
Theodore Roosevelt
Carolus Linnaeus
- 60 -
Francis Galton
Linus Pauling
Immanuel Kant
Martin Fischer
Robert Boyle
Karl Popper
Paul Dirac
Avicenna
James Watson
William Shakespeare
- 50 -
Stephen Hawking
Niels Bohr
Nikola Tesla
Rachel Carson
Max Planck
Henry Adams
Richard Dawkins
Werner Heisenberg
Alfred Wegener
John Dalton
- 40 -
Pierre Fermat
Edward Wilson
Johannes Kepler
Gustave Eiffel
Giordano Bruno
JJ Thomson
Thomas Kuhn
Leonardo DaVinci
Archimedes
David Hume
- 30 -
Andreas Vesalius
Rudolf Virchow
Richard Feynman
James Hutton
Alexander Fleming
Emile Durkheim
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Oppenheimer
Robert Hooke
Charles Kettering
- 20 -
Carl Sagan
James Maxwell
Marie Curie
Rene Descartes
Francis Crick
Hippocrates
Michael Faraday
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
- 10 -
Aristotle
John Watson
Rosalind Franklin
Michio Kaku
Isaac Asimov
Charles Darwin
Sigmund Freud
Albert Einstein
Florence Nightingale
Isaac Newton


by Ian Ellis
who invites your feedback
Thank you for sharing.
Today in Science History
Sign up for Newsletter
with quiz, quotes and more.