Celebrating 24 Years on the Web
Find science on or your birthday

Today in Science History - Quickie Quiz
Who said: “Truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and not in the multiplicity and confusion of things.”
more quiz questions >>

Interstate Bill Signed by President Eisenhower

29 June 1956

Photo of Officials watching President Einsenhower sign the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1954. There is no photo for the 1956 Act.
In this photo, President Eisenhower signs the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1954. There was no similar photo for the landmark Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956 because Eisenhower was in hospital when he signed the bill on 29 Jun 1956. He was recovering from surgery at the Water Reed Medical Center, so despite the momentous significance of the Act, there was no ceremony and no photographer present. (source)

On Friday, 29 June 1956, President Eisenhower kicked off the largest road-building program in the history of the U.S.A. Of the $33,480,000,000 total cost, a large share of the cost would be met by the federal government, with much smaller matching contributions from the states He signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, a bipartisan bill sent to him by Congress three days earlier in the week, which authorized the expenditure.

There was no ceremony or photographer present because he signed it where he was recovering from surgery at the Walter Reed Medical Center in Washington, D.C. The President was highly “pleased,” reported the White House press secretary, James C. Hagerty, as he announced that the bill had been signed. Earlier Federal-Aid Highway Acts of 1952 and 1954 had been totally inadequate to build an effective national network. But the President had been a strong advocate for this ambitious plan for the country, and finally, in June 1956, the means were in place.

The Secretary of Commerce, Sinclair Weeks, called it “the greatest public-works program in the history of the world.” He also announced that he had instructed the Bureau of Public Roads to expedite the start of process. He anticipated new construction to be under way within the next two to three months.

A network of 41,000 miles of limited-access roads–the interstate system–had been planned to link 90 percent of cities with populations over 50,000 people. For this, the Federal Government would provide $25,000,000 during the following 13 years, which would cover 90 per cent of the cost, to states matching with the other 10 per cent. Thus no special highway bonds would be needed.

Such a huge project, Secretary Weeks said, would not only be a major boost to the nation’s economy, but would also bring the benefits of reduced traffic congestion, with the saving of thousands of lives on roads built for greater safety.

The Associated General Contractors of America were eager to get started, and predicted that the first $100,000,000 in contracts would be awarded by the end of September. The survey undertaken by the organization indicated four times that amount would be allocated by the end of the year.

Total Cost and Funding

For government income to balance such a huge outlay, the bill raised highway user taxes. Effective on Sunday, 1 July (two days after the bill was signed) for sixteen years, the existing 2 cents per gallon tax on motor fuels was to increase to 3 cents. The federal tax on tires was to rise from 5 cents per pound to 8 cents. The excise tax on trucks, buses and trailers would change from 8 per cent of the manufacturer’s price to 10 per cent. Also, a new annual levy of $1.50 per 1,000 pounds. was placed on heavy trucks and buses.

Of the total Federal appropriations of $28,057,000,000, the interstate system would use $25,000,000. The balance was to provide a three-year increase in other Federal highway aid, for park, forest and other federally funded roads. The matching contribution from states was to be $5,425,000,000. The Federal appropriation represented three times the former annual Federal outlay for the road program.

Getting Started

Secretary Weeks announced that the first year’s distribution to the states would be $1,125,000,000, which allocated one billion dollars for interstate projects, plus $125 million for other primary, secondary feeder and urban highways.

Specific amounts for each state varied according to need. For example, the Saturday, 30 Jun 1956 issue of the New York Times reported “New York gets $78,871,222, with $70,893,783 going for work on interstate highways. New Jersey gets $24,278,783 and Connecticut gets $10,794,417.”

Peak Operations by 1960

The Associated General Contractors (an organization including most of the road building contractors in America) expected that, quoting the reporter in the same newspaper, “the program would reach peak levels by 1960 with total highway, road and street construction ranging between $8,000,000,000 and $9,000,000,000 a year.”

Then, by the organization’s reported estimate, workers involved in the direct construction of the road system would number a monthly average of 435,000 to 450,000 (up from 300,000 before the project). A similar increase was also expected in the associated transportation, administration and production of the construction materials from mines, forests and factories.

Nature bears long with those who wrong her. She is patient under abuse. But when abuse has gone too far, when the time of reckoning finally comes, she is equally slow to be appeased and to turn away her wrath. (1882) -- Nathaniel Egleston, who was writing then about deforestation, but speaks equally well about the danger of climate change today.
Carl Sagan Thumbnail Carl Sagan: In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. (1987) ...(more by Sagan)

Albert Einstein: I used to wonder how it comes about that the electron is negative. Negative-positive—these are perfectly symmetric in physics. There is no reason whatever to prefer one to the other. Then why is the electron negative? I thought about this for a long time and at last all I could think was “It won the fight!” ...(more by Einstein)

Richard Feynman: It is the facts that matter, not the proofs. Physics can progress without the proofs, but we can't go on without the facts ... if the facts are right, then the proofs are a matter of playing around with the algebra correctly. ...(more by Feynman)
Quotations by:Albert EinsteinIsaac NewtonLord KelvinCharles DarwinSrinivasa RamanujanCarl SaganFlorence NightingaleThomas EdisonAristotleMarie CurieBenjamin FranklinWinston ChurchillGalileo GalileiSigmund FreudRobert BunsenLouis PasteurTheodore RooseveltAbraham LincolnRonald ReaganLeonardo DaVinciMichio KakuKarl PopperJohann GoetheRobert OppenheimerCharles Kettering  ... (more people)

Quotations about:Atomic  BombBiologyChemistryDeforestationEngineeringAnatomyAstronomyBacteriaBiochemistryBotanyConservationDinosaurEnvironmentFractalGeneticsGeologyHistory of ScienceInventionJupiterKnowledgeLoveMathematicsMeasurementMedicineNatural ResourceOrganic ChemistryPhysicsPhysicianQuantum TheoryResearchScience and ArtTeacherTechnologyUniverseVolcanoVirusWind PowerWomen ScientistsX-RaysYouthZoology  ... (more topics)

Thank you for sharing.
- 100 -
Sophie Germain
Gertrude Elion
Ernest Rutherford
James Chadwick
Marcel Proust
William Harvey
Johann Goethe
John Keynes
Carl Gauss
Paul Feyerabend
- 90 -
Antoine Lavoisier
Lise Meitner
Charles Babbage
Ibn Khaldun
Ralph Emerson
Robert Bunsen
Frederick Banting
Andre Ampere
Winston Churchill
- 80 -
John Locke
Bronislaw Malinowski
Thomas Huxley
Alessandro Volta
Erwin Schrodinger
Wilhelm Roentgen
Louis Pasteur
Bertrand Russell
Jean Lamarck
- 70 -
Samuel Morse
John Wheeler
Nicolaus Copernicus
Robert Fulton
Pierre Laplace
Humphry Davy
Thomas Edison
Lord Kelvin
Theodore Roosevelt
Carolus Linnaeus
- 60 -
Francis Galton
Linus Pauling
Immanuel Kant
Martin Fischer
Robert Boyle
Karl Popper
Paul Dirac
James Watson
William Shakespeare
- 50 -
Stephen Hawking
Niels Bohr
Nikola Tesla
Rachel Carson
Max Planck
Henry Adams
Richard Dawkins
Werner Heisenberg
Alfred Wegener
John Dalton
- 40 -
Pierre Fermat
Edward Wilson
Johannes Kepler
Gustave Eiffel
Giordano Bruno
JJ Thomson
Thomas Kuhn
Leonardo DaVinci
David Hume
- 30 -
Andreas Vesalius
Rudolf Virchow
Richard Feynman
James Hutton
Alexander Fleming
Emile Durkheim
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Oppenheimer
Robert Hooke
Charles Kettering
- 20 -
Carl Sagan
James Maxwell
Marie Curie
Rene Descartes
Francis Crick
Michael Faraday
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
- 10 -
John Watson
Rosalind Franklin
Michio Kaku
Isaac Asimov
Charles Darwin
Sigmund Freud
Albert Einstein
Florence Nightingale
Isaac Newton

by Ian Ellis
who invites your feedback
Thank you for sharing.
Today in Science History
Sign up for Newsletter
with quiz, quotes and more.