TODAY IN SCIENCE HISTORY ®  •  TODAYINSCI ®
Celebrating 25 Years on the Web
Find science on or your birthday

Today in Science History - Quickie Quiz
Who said: “Environmental extremists ... wouldn�t let you build a house unless it looked like a bird�s nest.”
more quiz questions >>

Coal Pipeline in Ohio

The announcement by the Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Company (Pitt-Consol) was made on 12 Sep 1956 and published in the New York Times that it had finished laying 108 miles of pipe to transport its coal. However, three huge pumping stations, placed about 35 miles apart on the steel pipeline, were still to be completed. It was the world’s first long-distance commercial coal pipeline, designed to carry a slurry of half water and half fine-screened coal from a vast open pit mine near Georgetown, Ohio to an electricity generating plant near Cleveland, Ohio. The steel pipeline had an inside diameter of 10-inches, and was designed to carry 150 tons of coal per hour. The project cost was estimated in 1956 as around $10,000,000. Pitt-Consol was the largest coal company in the U.S.

On 20 Feb 1957, there was a preliminary test on the coal slurry pipeline. Although some years earlier, the idea of pushing coal through a pipeline might have sounded like a fantasy, after a millon-dollar investment on a feasibility study, a practical project had been developed. The necessary conditions to maintain turbulence in the two-phase fluid that would keep particles in suspension had been worked out, and a minimum and maximum speed was engineered. This was the progress made since six years earlier, when the New York Times (4 Apr 1951) had an article on the announcement by the coal company that it was going to build a 17,000-foot-long demonstration pipeline.

Original hopes had been to have the full pipeline opened by Apr 1957. However, the teething problems extended for a year, because it was not until 28 Feb 1958, that the trouble shooters were reported to have the pipeline ready to go into full operation, “after a year of harassing delays.” The pipeline had been running 24-hour tests, then being stopped for check-ups. However, by this time, there had been a full five-day period delivering coal. Part of the solution had been to install new grinding equipment at the mine site to produce a higher percentage of finer coal particles in the pipeline mixture. Early transport problems had been due to the size of the pulverized coal, for in Apr 1957, a clog of oversize coal granules had plugged the line. Locating the plug to remove it had taken “considerable time.” Also, there was concern than the station pumps, despite their terrific pressure, couldn’t force the coal slurry up a steep hill south of Carrollton, Ohio.

However, by 17 Aug 1958, Pitt-Consol announced the pipeline was in full operation, and in fact, its coal deliveries through the pipeline had been operating at full capacity for several weeks. A total of 102,000 tons of coal had traveled through the pipeline in the first full month of operation, which matched the estimated capacity of 100,000 tons a month. By now, the project cost was reported as $13,500,000.

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company was reported as hoping to save $12,500,000 annually on railroad freight costs, by moving the coal in this form from the Pitt-Consol mining operation, to the Eastlake Generating Plant, 20 miles outside of Cleveland. The coal supplier had a contract to deliver 18,000,000 tons of coal over a 15 year period. At the outset, rail tariffs were $3.47 per ton, whereas the pipeline could deliver the coal, including preparation and dewatering costs at less than $3.00 per ton.

The slurry traveled at an average of three miles per hour, to complete the 108-mile trip in a little over 35 hours. On arrival, water was removed and the finely-powdered coal was dried in a five-story processing plant, to ready it for use as fuel in boilers producing steam to drive turbines powering the Cleveland Electric generators.

For the route of the pipeline, the Ohio legislature had granted the right of eminent domain. At the time, this was facilitated by the initial participation of the railroads, which gave no opposition. The rail companies expected to benefit from intimate knowledge of the progress and problems of this first of its kind project. Also, the mine, as one of the largest in the country, would also extract more lump coal while producing the required quantity of pulverized output for the pipeline, and the railroads would get their benefit when hauling the bulk coal.

Despite the original expectations, the pipeline was only used for six years from 1957 to 1963, but did deliver 6 million tons of coal in that time. Although it was highly efficient, and environmentally relatively benign, it was mothballed when the railroads offered competitively low freight tariffs of $1.88 per ton. The pipeline was kept on call to discourage the railroad increasing rates later. Within 20 years of its startup, the Ohio pipeline did, however, inspire another fifteen long-distance slurry pipelines to be built in various places around the world, including the U.S. The Black Mesa pipeline began operation in western states in November 1970.

Any new proposed construction of coal pipelines is hampered by the issues of eminent domain for the route, water availability and rights, and of course lobbying by the railroad industry, which transports about two-thirds of the coal produced in the U.S.

According the Right Of Way magazine (Aug 1982), the concept of a coal slurry pipeline was patented as long ago as 1891, and a first coal slurry pilot plant was built in a vacant lot at 58th Street and Madison Avenue in New York City. An operational 1,750-ft hydraulic coal pipeline was first built in England (1914), to move coal from barges at the Thames River docks into London. It was able to wind around buildings that blocked the route of a mechanical conveyor.

Text by Ian Ellis, with reference to newspapers in the Google News Archive.


Nature bears long with those who wrong her. She is patient under abuse. But when abuse has gone too far, when the time of reckoning finally comes, she is equally slow to be appeased and to turn away her wrath. (1882) -- Nathaniel Egleston, who was writing then about deforestation, but speaks equally well about the danger of climate change today.
Carl Sagan Thumbnail Carl Sagan: In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. (1987) ...(more by Sagan)

Albert Einstein: I used to wonder how it comes about that the electron is negative. Negative-positive—these are perfectly symmetric in physics. There is no reason whatever to prefer one to the other. Then why is the electron negative? I thought about this for a long time and at last all I could think was “It won the fight!” ...(more by Einstein)

Richard Feynman: It is the facts that matter, not the proofs. Physics can progress without the proofs, but we can't go on without the facts ... if the facts are right, then the proofs are a matter of playing around with the algebra correctly. ...(more by Feynman)
Quotations by:Albert EinsteinIsaac NewtonLord KelvinCharles DarwinSrinivasa RamanujanCarl SaganFlorence NightingaleThomas EdisonAristotleMarie CurieBenjamin FranklinWinston ChurchillGalileo GalileiSigmund FreudRobert BunsenLouis PasteurTheodore RooseveltAbraham LincolnRonald ReaganLeonardo DaVinciMichio KakuKarl PopperJohann GoetheRobert OppenheimerCharles Kettering  ... (more people)

Quotations about:Atomic  BombBiologyChemistryDeforestationEngineeringAnatomyAstronomyBacteriaBiochemistryBotanyConservationDinosaurEnvironmentFractalGeneticsGeologyHistory of ScienceInventionJupiterKnowledgeLoveMathematicsMeasurementMedicineNatural ResourceOrganic ChemistryPhysicsPhysicianQuantum TheoryResearchScience and ArtTeacherTechnologyUniverseVolcanoVirusWind PowerWomen ScientistsX-RaysYouthZoology  ... (more topics)

Thank you for sharing.
- 100 -
Sophie Germain
Gertrude Elion
Ernest Rutherford
James Chadwick
Marcel Proust
William Harvey
Johann Goethe
John Keynes
Carl Gauss
Paul Feyerabend
- 90 -
Antoine Lavoisier
Lise Meitner
Charles Babbage
Ibn Khaldun
Euclid
Ralph Emerson
Robert Bunsen
Frederick Banting
Andre Ampere
Winston Churchill
- 80 -
John Locke
Bronislaw Malinowski
Bible
Thomas Huxley
Alessandro Volta
Erwin Schrodinger
Wilhelm Roentgen
Louis Pasteur
Bertrand Russell
Jean Lamarck
- 70 -
Samuel Morse
John Wheeler
Nicolaus Copernicus
Robert Fulton
Pierre Laplace
Humphry Davy
Thomas Edison
Lord Kelvin
Theodore Roosevelt
Carolus Linnaeus
- 60 -
Francis Galton
Linus Pauling
Immanuel Kant
Martin Fischer
Robert Boyle
Karl Popper
Paul Dirac
Avicenna
James Watson
William Shakespeare
- 50 -
Stephen Hawking
Niels Bohr
Nikola Tesla
Rachel Carson
Max Planck
Henry Adams
Richard Dawkins
Werner Heisenberg
Alfred Wegener
John Dalton
- 40 -
Pierre Fermat
Edward Wilson
Johannes Kepler
Gustave Eiffel
Giordano Bruno
JJ Thomson
Thomas Kuhn
Leonardo DaVinci
Archimedes
David Hume
- 30 -
Andreas Vesalius
Rudolf Virchow
Richard Feynman
James Hutton
Alexander Fleming
Emile Durkheim
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Oppenheimer
Robert Hooke
Charles Kettering
- 20 -
Carl Sagan
James Maxwell
Marie Curie
Rene Descartes
Francis Crick
Hippocrates
Michael Faraday
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
- 10 -
Aristotle
John Watson
Rosalind Franklin
Michio Kaku
Isaac Asimov
Charles Darwin
Sigmund Freud
Albert Einstein
Florence Nightingale
Isaac Newton


by Ian Ellis
who invites your feedback
Thank you for sharing
on Blue Sky.
Today in Science History
Sign up for Newsletter
with quiz, quotes and more.