TODAY IN SCIENCE HISTORY ®  •  TODAYINSCI ®
Celebrating 24 Years on the Web
Find science on or your birthday

Today in Science History - Quickie Quiz
Who said: “A change in motion is proportional to the motive force impressed and takes place along the straight line in which that force is impressed.”
more quiz questions >>
Thumbnail of Martin Kamen (source)
Martin Kamen
(27 Aug 1913 - 31 Aug 2002)

Canadian-American biochemist who co-discovered (27 Feb 1940) the synthesis of the isotope carbon-14 by bombarding a target of graphite with sub-atomic particles. He worked with Sam Ruben at Berkeley, California.


Unlocking the Enigma of Photosynthesis with Radioactive Carbon

The early research of Martin Kamen and Samuel Ruben (1941)

Research published in 1941 cast doubt on longstanding theories about photosynthesis, by employing radioactive carbon-14, in breakthrough experiments at the University of California. The work was conducted by Dr. Samuel Ruben of the Department of Chemistry and Dr. Martin D. Kamen from the Radiation Laboratory.

Carbon-14 atoms were produced using an atom-smashing cyclotron, by bombarding a target of graphite with deuterons (the nuclei of heavy hydrogen, containing a proton and an additional neutron). These radioactive atoms provided a pivotal new technique to explore plant chemistry, powerful enough to challenge existing notions about photosynthesis.

As a result of their studies, a previously unknown compound was identified that carries out what had earlier been thought to be the role of formaldehyde as an intermediary in the process of photosynthesis.

Scientists formerly had hypothesized that during photosynthesis, plants take in carbon dioxide, light, and water, to initially produce formaldehyde. This formaldehyde was then thought to undergo further reactions, driven by chlorophyll, to produce carbohydrates and other essential organic molecules.

However, the new research traced the path of radioactive carbon through the chemical changes during stages of photosynthesis. These experiments showed that formaldehyde did not contain the radioactive carbon—and thus was not the intermediary as once thought. Instead another, as yet unidentified, compound absorbed most of the radioactive carbon, suggesting that this compound might play the role that formaldehyde was initially believed to perform in photosynthesis.

Understanding photosynthesis is at the heart of the broader biological context of animals in the intricate web of life.

All animals, ranging from humans to microscopic organisms, rely on plants’ remarkable capability to transform basic inorganic elements into organic forms digestible for animals. Without the intervention of plants, animals would be unable to derive sustenance directly from nature’s primary sources like soil, water, and air. Through a complex chemical process involving chlorophyll, the green pigment in plants, they can transform these essential elements into a range of organic foods, from sugars to vitamins. This transformative process is what we know as photosynthesis.

Scientists have long been perplexed by the intricacies of photosynthesis. Numerous theories have been proposed, but definitive proof remained elusive due to the limitations of chemical investigative methods.

The prevailing belief was that plants, using light, carbon dioxide, and water, first produced formaldehyde, which acted as a preliminary step before chlorophyll initiated the creation of nutrients such as carbohydrates. To test this, Ruben and Kamen introduced algae to an environment rich in radioactive carbon dioxide. As these plants absorbed the radioactive carbon from the air, scientists could trace its path. Contrary to expectations, formaldehyde produced by the plants lacked the radioactive carbon.

Surprisingly, they identified an unforeseen compound that had absorbed most of the radioactive carbon—positioning itself as the real initial phase in photosynthesis. The exact chemical structure of this pivotal compound is still under investigation.

Furthermore, Drs. Ruben and Kamen, with their team debunked the notion that photosynthesis exclusively occurs in the presence of light. Their findings suggested that certain stages of photosynthesis might not be dependent on light, as plants continued to absorb radioactive carbon dioxide even in complete darkness.

Thus, the work by Dr. Ruben and Dr. Kamen has reshaped our understanding of photosynthesis, challenging long-held beliefs and unveiling new avenues for exploration. As we delve deeper into this critical biological process, the broader implications for fields like agriculture and bioenergy become ever more significant. Such discoveries underscore the evolving nature of scientific knowledge and the exciting horizons yet to be explored.

Ref: 'Radioactive Carbon Reveals Secrets of Photosynthesis', The Science News-Letter (25 Oct 1941), 40, No. 17, 268.

See also:
  • 27 Aug - short biography, births, deaths and events on date of Kamen's birth.
  • Hot Carbon: Carbon-14 and a Revolution in Science, by John Marra. - book suggestion.
  • Booklist for Carbon.

Nature bears long with those who wrong her. She is patient under abuse. But when abuse has gone too far, when the time of reckoning finally comes, she is equally slow to be appeased and to turn away her wrath. (1882) -- Nathaniel Egleston, who was writing then about deforestation, but speaks equally well about the danger of climate change today.
Carl Sagan Thumbnail Carl Sagan: In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. (1987) ...(more by Sagan)

Albert Einstein: I used to wonder how it comes about that the electron is negative. Negative-positive—these are perfectly symmetric in physics. There is no reason whatever to prefer one to the other. Then why is the electron negative? I thought about this for a long time and at last all I could think was “It won the fight!” ...(more by Einstein)

Richard Feynman: It is the facts that matter, not the proofs. Physics can progress without the proofs, but we can't go on without the facts ... if the facts are right, then the proofs are a matter of playing around with the algebra correctly. ...(more by Feynman)
Quotations by:Albert EinsteinIsaac NewtonLord KelvinCharles DarwinSrinivasa RamanujanCarl SaganFlorence NightingaleThomas EdisonAristotleMarie CurieBenjamin FranklinWinston ChurchillGalileo GalileiSigmund FreudRobert BunsenLouis PasteurTheodore RooseveltAbraham LincolnRonald ReaganLeonardo DaVinciMichio KakuKarl PopperJohann GoetheRobert OppenheimerCharles Kettering  ... (more people)

Quotations about:Atomic  BombBiologyChemistryDeforestationEngineeringAnatomyAstronomyBacteriaBiochemistryBotanyConservationDinosaurEnvironmentFractalGeneticsGeologyHistory of ScienceInventionJupiterKnowledgeLoveMathematicsMeasurementMedicineNatural ResourceOrganic ChemistryPhysicsPhysicianQuantum TheoryResearchScience and ArtTeacherTechnologyUniverseVolcanoVirusWind PowerWomen ScientistsX-RaysYouthZoology  ... (more topics)

Thank you for sharing.
- 100 -
Sophie Germain
Gertrude Elion
Ernest Rutherford
James Chadwick
Marcel Proust
William Harvey
Johann Goethe
John Keynes
Carl Gauss
Paul Feyerabend
- 90 -
Antoine Lavoisier
Lise Meitner
Charles Babbage
Ibn Khaldun
Euclid
Ralph Emerson
Robert Bunsen
Frederick Banting
Andre Ampere
Winston Churchill
- 80 -
John Locke
Bronislaw Malinowski
Bible
Thomas Huxley
Alessandro Volta
Erwin Schrodinger
Wilhelm Roentgen
Louis Pasteur
Bertrand Russell
Jean Lamarck
- 70 -
Samuel Morse
John Wheeler
Nicolaus Copernicus
Robert Fulton
Pierre Laplace
Humphry Davy
Thomas Edison
Lord Kelvin
Theodore Roosevelt
Carolus Linnaeus
- 60 -
Francis Galton
Linus Pauling
Immanuel Kant
Martin Fischer
Robert Boyle
Karl Popper
Paul Dirac
Avicenna
James Watson
William Shakespeare
- 50 -
Stephen Hawking
Niels Bohr
Nikola Tesla
Rachel Carson
Max Planck
Henry Adams
Richard Dawkins
Werner Heisenberg
Alfred Wegener
John Dalton
- 40 -
Pierre Fermat
Edward Wilson
Johannes Kepler
Gustave Eiffel
Giordano Bruno
JJ Thomson
Thomas Kuhn
Leonardo DaVinci
Archimedes
David Hume
- 30 -
Andreas Vesalius
Rudolf Virchow
Richard Feynman
James Hutton
Alexander Fleming
Emile Durkheim
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Oppenheimer
Robert Hooke
Charles Kettering
- 20 -
Carl Sagan
James Maxwell
Marie Curie
Rene Descartes
Francis Crick
Hippocrates
Michael Faraday
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
- 10 -
Aristotle
John Watson
Rosalind Franklin
Michio Kaku
Isaac Asimov
Charles Darwin
Sigmund Freud
Albert Einstein
Florence Nightingale
Isaac Newton


by Ian Ellis
who invites your feedback
Thank you for sharing.
Today in Science History
Sign up for Newsletter
with quiz, quotes and more.