TODAY IN SCIENCE HISTORY ®  •  TODAYINSCI ®
Celebrating 24 Years on the Web
Find science on or your birthday

Today in Science History - Quickie Quiz
Who said: “Environmental extremists ... wouldn�t let you build a house unless it looked like a bird�s nest.”
more quiz questions >>
Thumbnail of Ernest Orlando Lawrence (source)
Ernest Orlando Lawrence
(8 Aug 1901 - 27 Aug 1958)

American physicist who invented the cyclotron, the first device for the production of high energy particles. He was awarded the 1939 Nobel Prize for Physics for this work.


Time magazine featured Ernest Orlando Lawrence on its cover for 1 Nov 1937. The caption under his picture read “He creates and destroys.” He was 37 years old, but had already made an international name for himself by inventing a powerful apparatus for investigating atoms. It was the “cyclotron.” The equipment enabled whirling particles around in a strong magnetic field, imparting great speeds to them, turning them into projectiles to smash atoms

The event celebrated by the Time article was that Lawrence had just been awarded the prestigious Comstock Prize on 26 Oct 1937, for his invention of the cyclotron. It was presented at a dinner during the Fall Meeting of the National Academy of Sciences in Rochester, N.Y. Dr William D. Coolidge, director of the research laboratory of the General Electric Corporation in paying tribute to the young recipient, also recognized the pioneer of atom-smashing, Lord Rutherford, who had died the previous week.

Lawrence had met Rutherford four years earlier at a European scientific conference in Brussels. Leaving the ramshackle old building where he worked on the sunny campus of the University of California, Lawrence headed east across the Atlantic Ocean, having been the sole U.S. scientist invited to attend.

Lord Ernest Rutherford, attending the conference from Britain, was the revered director of Cambridge University's Cavendish Laboratory. He was a gruff, burly man known for his research penetrating deep into the atom to formulate the atom’s electrical structure. Accompanying him was John Douglas Cockroft, described in the Time article as “one of Rutherford’s imaginative young workers.” Cockcroft was at that time splitting lithium atoms by hurling protons at them, energized with high voltages powered by transformers, rectifiers and condensers.

Realising the great potential of Lawrence’s machine, Cockcroft had tried to persuade Lord Rutherford to acquire one for their laboratory. Rutherford had been unimpressed by the idea. But while they were together in Brussels, Cockcroft recruited Lawrence to pitch the idea firsthand to the senior physicist in a sales talk. Rutherford remained unconvinced, asserting his principle that the equipment used at the Cavendish should be developed there. Dr. Lawrence won him over, according to the Time article, with the remark that “Sir, you use spectrometers in the laboratory every day, but they weren’t invented there, were they?”

Indeed, within a couple of years after the Brussels conference, the Cavendish Laboratory committed to building their own atom-smasher based on Lawrence’s cyclotron. Construction commenced, and when the article was published there was but perhaps a month to go before it was finished. Sadly, Lord Rutherford would not see it in operation. On 19 Oct 1937, at age 66, Rutherford died unexpectedly after a delayed abdominal operation for a strangulated hernia.

As described in the Time article, “Said 80-year-old Sir J. J. Thomson, famed discoverer of the electron, who once was Rutherford’s teacher: ‘His work was so great that it cannot be compassed in a few words. His death is one of the greatest losses ever to occur to British science.’”

For his pioneering work probing inside atoms, Rutherford is now known known as the “Father of the Nuclear Age.” Following the old pioneers in atomic physics, Ernest O. Lawrence became one of the new. He made formidable use of his powerful cyclotron and was the leading American investigator of artificial radioactivity as both a destroyer and creator of atoms.

Thus it was fitting that Lawrence was awarded the Comstock Prize ($2,500 and a certificate) by the National Academy. It is notable that the Comstock Prize is its highest honor, awarded only once every five years. The organization itself, with its membership then limited to 300 scientists, is one of the most distinguished scientific institutions in the U.S.

Much of the following description of what was known in 1937 about atoms, and the development of the cyclotron, also comes from the Time article.

Atom Anatomy

The word atomwas coined by Democritus, an ancient Greek philosopher. Even at that time, there were thinkers who believed that repeatedly dividing and subdividing an object would eventually result in the smallest possible part of matter than could no longer be cut into smaller pieces. Hence the word atom has the meaning of indivisible - or more literally cannot be cut. But it remained a concept that went no further.

Thousands of years later, when John Dalton presented his Atomic Theory, he asserted that all matter is made of atoms, which are indivisible and indestructible. Further, he stated that compounds are formed by a combination of two or more different kinds of atoms. The view of the indestructible atom was rendered obsolete by the atom-smashing work of Rutherford and Lawrence. Indeed, the atoms are small, we know know that none are larger than about .00000001 inch in diameter.

Rutherford investigated the structure of the atom and found practically all the mass of the atom is in its positively charged nucleus, which is tiny compared to the size of the atom when surrounded by the negatively charged electrons. The simplest atom comprises of a single proton and a single electron “spinning” around it. Neutrons, without electric charge, and about the size of a proton also pack into the nucleus of the remaining atoms. In 1937, the heaviest known element was uranium, with 92 protons and 146 neutrons, surrounded by 92 electrons.

Atom Smashing

The 16th century anatomist Vesalius systematically dissected human bodies to find out what is inside, how it works, and whatever else there was to learn about it. In the 20th century, physicists have the same motivation in their splitting of the atom - as they now go further into splitting the nucleus.

The fundamentals to smash atoms developed by 1937 are pretty much the same today. Quoting from the Time article they were (or are):

  1. a projectile of the same size range as the atom;
  2. means of imparting high speed to the projectile;
  3. a target containing the atoms to be smashed (a platinum screen, a tungsten wire, a pinch of phosphorus) which can be placed in the path of the bullets;
  4. a means of identifying the wreckage, so that the investigator may find out what has happened.

A commonly used projectile is the proton, because they can be provided by passing an electrical current through hydrogen gas to strip off the electrons and leave a positively charged particle. In the case of hydrogen atom, that produces an ion which is just the bare proton. Their charge is advantageous because they can be accelerated by electrical or electromagnetic impulses in the atom-smasher, of whatever design.

When these high-speed particles slam into the target material, most pass through accomplishing nothing, because any nucleus is a such a tiny target in any atom they meet. But chance still favors a few collisions of an ionized particle and a nucleus. In 1937, the known outcomes were

“A few protons score hits, splitting a nucleus into two or more fragments. The projectile itself may combine with a fragment or fragments to form a new substance. Or it may lodge in the nucleus, creating an overweight, unstable body which begins to give off particles and gamma rays. This is called artificial radioactivity.”

The debris could be best studied at that time by letting the fragments pass through a “cloud chamber” as invented by C.T.R. Wilson, born a Scotsman, working at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, England. For this inspired device, he was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1927.

From an article he published in 1923, the essence of how it worked is described in his own words as

  1. “The ionising rays are made to pass through moist air, or other gas, in which the water-vapour has been brought into the super-saturated state by sudden expansion of the gas.
  2. “Each ion liberated becomes at once the nucleus for the condensation of a visible droplet of water.
  3. “The clouds of drops thus formed are immediately photographed”.

The trails seen as droplets of fog vary in thickness and curvature in a magnetic field, from which investigators can determine the mass and speed of a fragment, and its electrical charge.


See also:
  • Science Quotes by Ernest Orlando Lawrence.
  • 8 Aug - short biography, births, deaths and events on date of Lawrence's birth.
  • An American Genius: The Life of Ernest Orlando Lawrence, by Childs Herbert. - book suggestion.
  • Booklist for Ernest Orlando Lawrence.

Nature bears long with those who wrong her. She is patient under abuse. But when abuse has gone too far, when the time of reckoning finally comes, she is equally slow to be appeased and to turn away her wrath. (1882) -- Nathaniel Egleston, who was writing then about deforestation, but speaks equally well about the danger of climate change today.
Carl Sagan Thumbnail Carl Sagan: In science it often happens that scientists say, 'You know that's a really good argument; my position is mistaken,' and then they would actually change their minds and you never hear that old view from them again. They really do it. It doesn't happen as often as it should, because scientists are human and change is sometimes painful. But it happens every day. I cannot recall the last time something like that happened in politics or religion. (1987) ...(more by Sagan)

Albert Einstein: I used to wonder how it comes about that the electron is negative. Negative-positive—these are perfectly symmetric in physics. There is no reason whatever to prefer one to the other. Then why is the electron negative? I thought about this for a long time and at last all I could think was “It won the fight!” ...(more by Einstein)

Richard Feynman: It is the facts that matter, not the proofs. Physics can progress without the proofs, but we can't go on without the facts ... if the facts are right, then the proofs are a matter of playing around with the algebra correctly. ...(more by Feynman)
Quotations by:Albert EinsteinIsaac NewtonLord KelvinCharles DarwinSrinivasa RamanujanCarl SaganFlorence NightingaleThomas EdisonAristotleMarie CurieBenjamin FranklinWinston ChurchillGalileo GalileiSigmund FreudRobert BunsenLouis PasteurTheodore RooseveltAbraham LincolnRonald ReaganLeonardo DaVinciMichio KakuKarl PopperJohann GoetheRobert OppenheimerCharles Kettering  ... (more people)

Quotations about:Atomic  BombBiologyChemistryDeforestationEngineeringAnatomyAstronomyBacteriaBiochemistryBotanyConservationDinosaurEnvironmentFractalGeneticsGeologyHistory of ScienceInventionJupiterKnowledgeLoveMathematicsMeasurementMedicineNatural ResourceOrganic ChemistryPhysicsPhysicianQuantum TheoryResearchScience and ArtTeacherTechnologyUniverseVolcanoVirusWind PowerWomen ScientistsX-RaysYouthZoology  ... (more topics)

Thank you for sharing.
- 100 -
Sophie Germain
Gertrude Elion
Ernest Rutherford
James Chadwick
Marcel Proust
William Harvey
Johann Goethe
John Keynes
Carl Gauss
Paul Feyerabend
- 90 -
Antoine Lavoisier
Lise Meitner
Charles Babbage
Ibn Khaldun
Euclid
Ralph Emerson
Robert Bunsen
Frederick Banting
Andre Ampere
Winston Churchill
- 80 -
John Locke
Bronislaw Malinowski
Bible
Thomas Huxley
Alessandro Volta
Erwin Schrodinger
Wilhelm Roentgen
Louis Pasteur
Bertrand Russell
Jean Lamarck
- 70 -
Samuel Morse
John Wheeler
Nicolaus Copernicus
Robert Fulton
Pierre Laplace
Humphry Davy
Thomas Edison
Lord Kelvin
Theodore Roosevelt
Carolus Linnaeus
- 60 -
Francis Galton
Linus Pauling
Immanuel Kant
Martin Fischer
Robert Boyle
Karl Popper
Paul Dirac
Avicenna
James Watson
William Shakespeare
- 50 -
Stephen Hawking
Niels Bohr
Nikola Tesla
Rachel Carson
Max Planck
Henry Adams
Richard Dawkins
Werner Heisenberg
Alfred Wegener
John Dalton
- 40 -
Pierre Fermat
Edward Wilson
Johannes Kepler
Gustave Eiffel
Giordano Bruno
JJ Thomson
Thomas Kuhn
Leonardo DaVinci
Archimedes
David Hume
- 30 -
Andreas Vesalius
Rudolf Virchow
Richard Feynman
James Hutton
Alexander Fleming
Emile Durkheim
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Oppenheimer
Robert Hooke
Charles Kettering
- 20 -
Carl Sagan
James Maxwell
Marie Curie
Rene Descartes
Francis Crick
Hippocrates
Michael Faraday
Srinivasa Ramanujan
Francis Bacon
Galileo Galilei
- 10 -
Aristotle
John Watson
Rosalind Franklin
Michio Kaku
Isaac Asimov
Charles Darwin
Sigmund Freud
Albert Einstein
Florence Nightingale
Isaac Newton


by Ian Ellis
who invites your feedback
Thank you for sharing.
Today in Science History
Sign up for Newsletter
with quiz, quotes and more.